Recent Supreme Court rulings are what brings this Prepography
cogitation on ‘Casuistry’ to you. Actually, it is the majority opinions reaffirming several decisions that bring us here. The US Supreme Court
has ruled in favor of what many see as the federal government’s overreach of power in several cases. In these cases, instead of reviewing the constitutionality of the law as written the majority decisions have apparently allowed political conscience to shape ‘legal’ judgment.
The Merriam-Webster definition of casuistry: casuistry noun ca·su·ist·ry \ˈkazh-wə-strē, ˈka-zhə-\ plural ca·su·ist·ries. Definition of CASUISTRY 1: a resolving of specific cases of conscience, duty, or conduct through interpretation of ethical principles or religious doctrine 2: specious argument : rationalization
A majority of Supreme Court justices have speciously rendered judgment based on the divined or redefined ‘intention’ of the lawmakers vs ruling on the laws as written. The majority opinion on King v. Bruwell (Affordable Care Act Subsidies Case) doesn’t even try to hide this fact. The law, as written, has no bearing on how it is interpreted and enforced. So, now every law written in the US is by precedent prefaced with the statement “what the law really intended was…”.
This is not a political screed. This is a word of caution for the readers of Prepography
. Make no mistake about it. The lifestyle that the type of person who reads Prepography
attempts to lead is antithetical to the future that our nation’s leaders (who increasingly look like an oligarchy) are trying to bring about. Prepography
readers seek the freedom to prepare as they see fit. They also seek self-sufficiency so that they do not have to rely on “the system”. This freedom and lack of dependency is a threat to those that wish to control every aspect of our daily lives. Previously, freedom loving people were protected by the law but our nation’s leaders, on the bench and both sides of the aisles no longer seem constrained by the law. In fact, our three branches of government almost seem to be conspiring to achieve a single desired outcome rather than serving as checks and balances on each other’s power. Poorly written laws no longer need to be re-written, they can just be ‘interpreted’ by judges and an increasingly powerful Executive branch that is serviced by legions of bureaucrats.
It doesn’t take a genius to understand that it won’t take long for the government to use this new precedent to further encroach on the freedoms and rights of people and groups who stand in opposition to the path the country is currently on. Dr. Thomas Sowell
described the resulting situation very succinctly in his recent article Supreme Court Disasters
: “When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, ‘we the people’ are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our “public servants” are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words.”