It’s Not a Welfare State, It’s a Special Interest State

It’s Not a Welfare State, It’s a Special Interest State

… a democratic republic cannot long survive as a special interest state. The destruction of economic value is too complete, as interests channel the money into unproductive uses—housing and education bubbles; alternative energy; battalions of compliance officers; a ruling class that depends on the iron rice bowl of the government giving its members jobs telling the masses what to do.

The destruction of other values is also serious. Respect now goes to the person who can best manipulate the system to extract resources for his clientele, not to the one who creates productive enterprises. The term “doer” becomes a synonym for “sap.” Private institutions respond to Big SIS by becoming Little SISes, choosing their leaders for their ability to schmooze the government rather than for skill or dedication in pursuing the mission of the institution. Log-rolling coalitions require that members of each group within the tent abandon any reservations about the demands of their allies.

Margaret Thatcher said that socialism eventually runs out of other people’s money, but in a socialist world the ruling class is at least trying to promote some vision of the general welfare, however demented. The special interest state is more degraded in that the general welfare is of little concern to the interests’ representatives. Arguments that their positions are destructive have no impact, except perhaps to send them back to their offices to grab more before the game ends.

The special interest state cannot keep growing and has no natural equilibrium point. So the question now is not whether but how it will end, and this is inscrutable. One can envision a period of creative politics and institution building in which an aroused public demands the dismantling of much of the special interest state, a cut-back in government, and the creation of new institutional controls to prevent a recurrence.

via It’s Not a Welfare State, It’s a Special Interest State — The American Magazine.

 

I keep reading that last line…

“One can envision a period of creative politics and institution building in which an aroused public demands the dismantling of much of the special interest state, a cut-back in government, and the creation of new institutional controls to prevent a recurrence.”

…and have to say that I’m having a hard time envisioning that period.  Given the dramatic spending increases orchestrated by the current and previous administration (even if you don’t count the war spending) I see people fighting for their piece of the pie rather than calling for necessary but painful spending cuts.  This culture of dependency and forced redistribution of wealth to special interest groups has the potential to break our great nation…both financially and morally.

468 ad

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: